Glaucoma OCT : Beyond the Basics

1. Please rate how well you think the session met the stated learning objectives below


At the end of this session, I am able to: *This question is required.

Space Cell	Strongly disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly agree
Identify common reasons for discrepancy between structure and function evaluations of glaucoma patients	Identify common reasons for discrepancy between structure and function evaluations of glaucoma patients: Strongly disagree	Identify common reasons for discrepancy between structure and function evaluations of glaucoma patients: Disagree	Identify common reasons for discrepancy between structure and function evaluations of glaucoma patients: Neutral	Identify common reasons for discrepancy between structure and function evaluations of glaucoma patients: Agree	Identify common reasons for discrepancy between structure and function evaluations of glaucoma patients: Strongly agree
Describe the difference between glaucomatous and non-glaucomatous abnormalities on glaucoma diagnostic testing	Describe the difference between glaucomatous and non-glaucomatous abnormalities on glaucoma diagnostic testing: Strongly disagree	Describe the difference between glaucomatous and non-glaucomatous abnormalities on glaucoma diagnostic testing: Disagree	Describe the difference between glaucomatous and non-glaucomatous abnormalities on glaucoma diagnostic testing: Neutral	Describe the difference between glaucomatous and non-glaucomatous abnormalities on glaucoma diagnostic testing: Agree	Describe the difference between glaucomatous and non-glaucomatous abnormalities on glaucoma diagnostic testing: Strongly agree
Appreciate the nuances of clinical decision making in cases where diagnostic testing is ambiguous	Appreciate the nuances of clinical decision making in cases where diagnostic testing is ambiguous: Strongly disagree	Appreciate the nuances of clinical decision making in cases where diagnostic testing is ambiguous: Disagree	Appreciate the nuances of clinical decision making in cases where diagnostic testing is ambiguous: Neutral	Appreciate the nuances of clinical decision making in cases where diagnostic testing is ambiguous: Agree	Appreciate the nuances of clinical decision making in cases where diagnostic testing is ambiguous: Strongly agree

2. The session met the following CanMEDS roles: *This question is required.

Space Cell	Strongly disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly agree
Medical Expert	Medical Expert: Strongly disagree	Medical Expert: Disagree	Medical Expert: Neutral	Medical Expert: Agree	Medical Expert: Strongly agree
Scholar	Scholar: Strongly disagree	Scholar: Disagree	Scholar: Neutral	Scholar: Agree	Scholar: Strongly agree

6. Please rate the following statements: *This question is required.

Space Cell	Strongly disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly agree
The content was relevant to my learning needs	The content was relevant to my learning needs: Strongly disagree	The content was relevant to my learning needs: Disagree	The content was relevant to my learning needs: Neutral	The content was relevant to my learning needs: Agree	The content was relevant to my learning needs: Strongly agree
The teaching methods were effective	The teaching methods were effective: Strongly disagree	The teaching methods were effective: Disagree	The teaching methods were effective: Neutral	The teaching methods were effective: Agree	The teaching methods were effective: Strongly agree
There was adequate time for questions and answers	There was adequate time for questions and answers: Strongly disagree	There was adequate time for questions and answers: Disagree	There was adequate time for questions and answers: Neutral	There was adequate time for questions and answers: Agree	There was adequate time for questions and answers: Strongly agree
The session was a suitable length	The session was a suitable length: Strongly disagree	The session was a suitable length: Disagree	The session was a suitable length: Neutral	The session was a suitable length: Agree	The session was a suitable length: Strongly agree
The speakers were engaging	The speakers were engaging: Strongly disagree	The speakers were engaging: Disagree	The speakers were engaging: Neutral	The speakers were engaging: Agree	The speakers were engaging: Strongly agree
The presentations were non-biased	The presentations were non-biased: Strongly disagree	The presentations were non-biased: Disagree	The presentations were non-biased: Neutral	The presentations were non-biased: Agree	The presentations were non-biased: Strongly agree