We've detected that Javascript is not enabled. It is required for an optimal survey taking experience.
Please check your browser's settings and make sure Javascript is turned on. Learn how to enable Javascript.

Skip survey header

Academic global ophthalmology – the integrating force in eliminating blindness

1. Please rate how well you think the session met the stated learning objectives below

At the end of this session, I am able to: *This question is required.

Space Cell	Strongly disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly agree
Understand the specific niche that an academic global ophthalmologist fills	Understand the specific niche that an academic global ophthalmologist fills: Strongly disagree	Understand the specific niche that an academic global ophthalmologist fills: Disagree	Understand the specific niche that an academic global ophthalmologist fills: Neutral	Understand the specific niche that an academic global ophthalmologist fills: Agree	Understand the specific niche that an academic global ophthalmologist fills: Strongly agree
Describe various possible career paths and training in global ophthalmology	Describe various possible career paths and training in global ophthalmology: Strongly disagree	Describe various possible career paths and training in global ophthalmology: Disagree	Describe various possible career paths and training in global ophthalmology: Neutral	Describe various possible career paths and training in global ophthalmology: Agree	Describe various possible career paths and training in global ophthalmology: Strongly agree
Demonstrate how technology can increase access to eye health	Demonstrate how technology can increase access to eye health: Strongly disagree	Demonstrate how technology can increase access to eye health: Disagree	Demonstrate how technology can increase access to eye health: Neutral	Demonstrate how technology can increase access to eye health: Agree	Demonstrate how technology can increase access to eye health: Strongly agree

2. The session met the following CanMEDS roles: *This question is required.

Space Cell	Strongly disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly agree
Health Advocate	Health Advocate: Strongly disagree	Health Advocate: Disagree	Health Advocate: Neutral	Health Advocate: Agree	Health Advocate: Strongly agree
Collaborator	Collaborator: Strongly disagree	Collaborator: Disagree	Collaborator: Neutral	Collaborator: Agree	Collaborator: Strongly agree

3. Based on this session, I will pursue additional learning on the following topics: *This question is required.

4. Based on this session, I will make the following changes to my practice: *This question is required.

5. Would you recommend this session topic for next year’s conference? Please explain : *This question is required.

6. Please rate the following statements: *This question is required.

Space Cell	Strongly disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly agree
The content was relevant to my learning needs	The content was relevant to my learning needs: Strongly disagree	The content was relevant to my learning needs: Disagree	The content was relevant to my learning needs: Neutral	The content was relevant to my learning needs: Agree	The content was relevant to my learning needs: Strongly agree
The teaching methods were effective	The teaching methods were effective: Strongly disagree	The teaching methods were effective: Disagree	The teaching methods were effective: Neutral	The teaching methods were effective: Agree	The teaching methods were effective: Strongly agree
There was adequate time for questions and answers	There was adequate time for questions and answers: Strongly disagree	There was adequate time for questions and answers: Disagree	There was adequate time for questions and answers: Neutral	There was adequate time for questions and answers: Agree	There was adequate time for questions and answers: Strongly agree
The session was a suitable length	The session was a suitable length: Strongly disagree	The session was a suitable length: Disagree	The session was a suitable length: Neutral	The session was a suitable length: Agree	The session was a suitable length: Strongly agree
The speakers were engaging	The speakers were engaging: Strongly disagree	The speakers were engaging: Disagree	The speakers were engaging: Neutral	The speakers were engaging: Agree	The speakers were engaging: Strongly agree
The presentations were non-biased	The presentations were non-biased: Strongly disagree	The presentations were non-biased: Disagree	The presentations were non-biased: Neutral	The presentations were non-biased: Agree	The presentations were non-biased: Strongly agree

If bias was perceived, please describe: *This question is required.

7. Additional comments: