We've detected that Javascript is not enabled. It is required for an optimal survey taking experience.
Please check your browser's settings and make sure Javascript is turned on. Learn how to enable Javascript.

Skip survey header

Paediatrics II: Mind the Gap... Filling in the Gaps in our Knowledge!

1. Please rate how well you think the session met the stated learning objectives below

At the end of this session, I am able to: *This question is required.

Space Cell	Strongly disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly agree
Describe Choroidal findings in premature babies with ROP	Describe Choroidal findings in premature babies with ROP: Strongly disagree	Describe Choroidal findings in premature babies with ROP: Disagree	Describe Choroidal findings in premature babies with ROP: Neutral	Describe Choroidal findings in premature babies with ROP: Agree	Describe Choroidal findings in premature babies with ROP: Strongly agree
Describe the recent recommendations in paediatric CMV screening	Describe the recent recommendations in paediatric CMV screening: Strongly disagree	Describe the recent recommendations in paediatric CMV screening: Disagree	Describe the recent recommendations in paediatric CMV screening: Neutral	Describe the recent recommendations in paediatric CMV screening: Agree	Describe the recent recommendations in paediatric CMV screening: Strongly agree
Describe the findings in optic nerve hypoplasia and its embryological explanation	Describe the findings in optic nerve hypoplasia and its embryological explanation: Strongly disagree	Describe the findings in optic nerve hypoplasia and its embryological explanation: Disagree	Describe the findings in optic nerve hypoplasia and its embryological explanation: Neutral	Describe the findings in optic nerve hypoplasia and its embryological explanation: Agree	Describe the findings in optic nerve hypoplasia and its embryological explanation: Strongly agree

2. The session met the following CanMEDS roles: *This question is required.

Space Cell	Strongly disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly agree
Medical Expert	Medical Expert: Strongly disagree	Medical Expert: Disagree	Medical Expert: Neutral	Medical Expert: Agree	Medical Expert: Strongly agree
Scholar	Scholar: Strongly disagree	Scholar: Disagree	Scholar: Neutral	Scholar: Agree	Scholar: Strongly agree

3. Based on this session, I will pursue additional learning on the following topics: *This question is required.

4. Based on this session, I will make the following changes to my practice: *This question is required.

5. Would you recommend this session topic for next year’s conference? Please explain : *This question is required.

6. Please rate the following statements: *This question is required.

Space Cell	Strongly disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly agree
The content was relevant to my learning needs	The content was relevant to my learning needs: Strongly disagree	The content was relevant to my learning needs: Disagree	The content was relevant to my learning needs: Neutral	The content was relevant to my learning needs: Agree	The content was relevant to my learning needs: Strongly agree
The teaching methods were effective	The teaching methods were effective: Strongly disagree	The teaching methods were effective: Disagree	The teaching methods were effective: Neutral	The teaching methods were effective: Agree	The teaching methods were effective: Strongly agree
There was adequate time for questions and answers	There was adequate time for questions and answers: Strongly disagree	There was adequate time for questions and answers: Disagree	There was adequate time for questions and answers: Neutral	There was adequate time for questions and answers: Agree	There was adequate time for questions and answers: Strongly agree
The session was a suitable length	The session was a suitable length: Strongly disagree	The session was a suitable length: Disagree	The session was a suitable length: Neutral	The session was a suitable length: Agree	The session was a suitable length: Strongly agree
The speakers were engaging	The speakers were engaging: Strongly disagree	The speakers were engaging: Disagree	The speakers were engaging: Neutral	The speakers were engaging: Agree	The speakers were engaging: Strongly agree
The presentations were non-biased	The presentations were non-biased: Strongly disagree	The presentations were non-biased: Disagree	The presentations were non-biased: Neutral	The presentations were non-biased: Agree	The presentations were non-biased: Strongly agree

If bias was perceived, please describe: *This question is required.

7. Additional comments: