We've detected that Javascript is not enabled. It is required for an optimal survey taking experience.
Please check your browser's settings and make sure Javascript is turned on. Learn how to enable Javascript.

Skip survey header

Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Ophthalmology II: EDI in Action: Using Research to Improve Eye Health Outcomes and the Ophthalmic Workforce

1. Please rate how well you think the session met the stated learning objectives below

At the end of this session, I am able to: *This question is required.

Space Cell	Strongly disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly agree
Identify disparities and under-represented groups within the landscape of Canadian ophthalmologists and ophthalmology trainees	Identify disparities and under-represented groups within the landscape of Canadian ophthalmologists and ophthalmology trainees : Strongly disagree	Identify disparities and under-represented groups within the landscape of Canadian ophthalmologists and ophthalmology trainees : Disagree	Identify disparities and under-represented groups within the landscape of Canadian ophthalmologists and ophthalmology trainees : Neutral	Identify disparities and under-represented groups within the landscape of Canadian ophthalmologists and ophthalmology trainees : Agree	Identify disparities and under-represented groups within the landscape of Canadian ophthalmologists and ophthalmology trainees : Strongly agree
Evaluate and critically appraise the sociodemographic diversity of ophthalmic clinical research	Evaluate and critically appraise the sociodemographic diversity of ophthalmic clinical research : Strongly disagree	Evaluate and critically appraise the sociodemographic diversity of ophthalmic clinical research : Disagree	Evaluate and critically appraise the sociodemographic diversity of ophthalmic clinical research : Neutral	Evaluate and critically appraise the sociodemographic diversity of ophthalmic clinical research : Agree	Evaluate and critically appraise the sociodemographic diversity of ophthalmic clinical research : Strongly agree
Describe how EDI principles can be applied to improve patient health outcomes	Describe how EDI principles can be applied to improve patient health outcomes : Strongly disagree	Describe how EDI principles can be applied to improve patient health outcomes : Disagree	Describe how EDI principles can be applied to improve patient health outcomes : Neutral	Describe how EDI principles can be applied to improve patient health outcomes : Agree	Describe how EDI principles can be applied to improve patient health outcomes : Strongly agree

2. The session met the following CanMEDS roles: *This question is required.

Space Cell	Strongly disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly agree
Health Advocate	Health Advocate: Strongly disagree	Health Advocate: Disagree	Health Advocate: Neutral	Health Advocate: Agree	Health Advocate: Strongly agree
Professional	Professional: Strongly disagree	Professional: Disagree	Professional: Neutral	Professional: Agree	Professional: Strongly agree

3. Based on this session, I will pursue additional learning on the following topics: *This question is required.

4. Based on this session, I will make the following changes to my practice: *This question is required.

5. Would you recommend this session topic for next year’s conference? Please explain : *This question is required.

6. Please rate the following statements: *This question is required.

Space Cell	Strongly disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly agree
The content was relevant to my learning needs	The content was relevant to my learning needs: Strongly disagree	The content was relevant to my learning needs: Disagree	The content was relevant to my learning needs: Neutral	The content was relevant to my learning needs: Agree	The content was relevant to my learning needs: Strongly agree
The teaching methods were effective	The teaching methods were effective: Strongly disagree	The teaching methods were effective: Disagree	The teaching methods were effective: Neutral	The teaching methods were effective: Agree	The teaching methods were effective: Strongly agree
There was adequate time for questions and answers	There was adequate time for questions and answers: Strongly disagree	There was adequate time for questions and answers: Disagree	There was adequate time for questions and answers: Neutral	There was adequate time for questions and answers: Agree	There was adequate time for questions and answers: Strongly agree
The session was a suitable length	The session was a suitable length: Strongly disagree	The session was a suitable length: Disagree	The session was a suitable length: Neutral	The session was a suitable length: Agree	The session was a suitable length: Strongly agree
The speakers were engaging	The speakers were engaging: Strongly disagree	The speakers were engaging: Disagree	The speakers were engaging: Neutral	The speakers were engaging: Agree	The speakers were engaging: Strongly agree
The presentations were non-biased	The presentations were non-biased: Strongly disagree	The presentations were non-biased: Disagree	The presentations were non-biased: Neutral	The presentations were non-biased: Agree	The presentations were non-biased: Strongly agree

If bias was perceived, please describe: *This question is required.

7. Additional comments: