We've detected that Javascript is not enabled. It is required for an optimal survey taking experience.
Please check your browser's settings and make sure Javascript is turned on. Learn how to enable Javascript.

Skip survey header

Paediatrics III: Retinopathy of Prematurity: Pathophysiology and Best Evidence for Prevention and Treatment

1. Please rate how well you think the session met the stated learning objectives below

At the end of this session, I am able to: *This question is required.

Space Cell	Strongly disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly agree
Describe the pathophysiology of ROP and best evidence for prevention	Describe the pathophysiology of ROP and best evidence for prevention : Strongly disagree	Describe the pathophysiology of ROP and best evidence for prevention : Disagree	Describe the pathophysiology of ROP and best evidence for prevention : Neutral	Describe the pathophysiology of ROP and best evidence for prevention : Agree	Describe the pathophysiology of ROP and best evidence for prevention : Strongly agree
Compare best treatment options for ROP	Compare best treatment options for ROP: Strongly disagree	Compare best treatment options for ROP: Disagree	Compare best treatment options for ROP: Neutral	Compare best treatment options for ROP: Agree	Compare best treatment options for ROP: Strongly agree
Understand the fragility of meta-analyses in ophthalmology	Understand the fragility of meta-analyses in ophthalmology : Strongly disagree	Understand the fragility of meta-analyses in ophthalmology : Disagree	Understand the fragility of meta-analyses in ophthalmology : Neutral	Understand the fragility of meta-analyses in ophthalmology : Agree	Understand the fragility of meta-analyses in ophthalmology : Strongly agree

2. The session met the following CanMEDS roles: *This question is required.

Space Cell	Strongly disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly agree
Medical Expert	Medical Expert: Strongly disagree	Medical Expert: Disagree	Medical Expert: Neutral	Medical Expert: Agree	Medical Expert: Strongly agree
Health Advocate	Health Advocate: Strongly disagree	Health Advocate: Disagree	Health Advocate: Neutral	Health Advocate: Agree	Health Advocate: Strongly agree

3. Based on this session, I will pursue additional learning on the following topics: *This question is required.

4. Based on this session, I will make the following changes to my practice: *This question is required.

5. Would you recommend this session topic for next year’s conference? Please explain : *This question is required.

6. Please rate the following statements: *This question is required.

Space Cell	Strongly disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly agree
The content was relevant to my learning needs	The content was relevant to my learning needs: Strongly disagree	The content was relevant to my learning needs: Disagree	The content was relevant to my learning needs: Neutral	The content was relevant to my learning needs: Agree	The content was relevant to my learning needs: Strongly agree
The teaching methods were effective	The teaching methods were effective: Strongly disagree	The teaching methods were effective: Disagree	The teaching methods were effective: Neutral	The teaching methods were effective: Agree	The teaching methods were effective: Strongly agree
There was adequate time for questions and answers	There was adequate time for questions and answers: Strongly disagree	There was adequate time for questions and answers: Disagree	There was adequate time for questions and answers: Neutral	There was adequate time for questions and answers: Agree	There was adequate time for questions and answers: Strongly agree
The session was a suitable length	The session was a suitable length: Strongly disagree	The session was a suitable length: Disagree	The session was a suitable length: Neutral	The session was a suitable length: Agree	The session was a suitable length: Strongly agree
The speakers were engaging	The speakers were engaging: Strongly disagree	The speakers were engaging: Disagree	The speakers were engaging: Neutral	The speakers were engaging: Agree	The speakers were engaging: Strongly agree
The presentations were non-biased	The presentations were non-biased: Strongly disagree	The presentations were non-biased: Disagree	The presentations were non-biased: Neutral	The presentations were non-biased: Agree	The presentations were non-biased: Strongly agree

If bias was perceived, please describe: *This question is required.

7. Additional comments: