Skip survey header

CSCIRA 2025 Conference Saturday Nov 15

Nimmi Bharatwal Lecturer

1. Rate the quality of the activity on a scale of 1 star (strongly disagree) to 5 stars (strongly agree). 
Space Cell Content RelevanceEnhanced my knowledgeSatisfied my expectationsConveyed information that applied to my practice
This Activity
2. Rate the quality of the activity on a scale of 1 star (strongly disagree) to 5 stars (strongly agree). 
Space Cell Used Effective Teaching MethodsAllocated at least 25% of the time for interactionOverall Presentation EffectivenessWas free from commercial bias?
This Activity
3. Rate your level of comfort with your ability to do the following on a scale of 1 to 5(1 = not at all comfortable, 5 = very comfortable) before and after attending this Learning program.)
Space Cell BeforeAfter
Knowledge (condition of being aware of facts or concepts)
Attitude (feelings, emotions, beliefs, or values displayed during a “task”; adopt new behaviour)
Skill (ability based on performance measured in time and precision)
4. Rate how well the learning objectives were met on a scale of 1 star (poor) to 5 stars (excellent).
Space Cell Rating
Explain the concept of the neuroanatomical-functional paradox in traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) and its implications for predicting functional outcomes and recovery.
Describe how lesion-affected and recovery-related neural networks contribute to variability in functional impairment and rehabilitation response following SCI.
Explore why individuals with similar spinal cord injuries experience different recovery outcomes.