We've detected that Javascript is not enabled. It is required for an optimal survey taking experience.
Please check your browser's settings and make sure Javascript is turned on. Learn how to enable Javascript.

Skip survey header

OAP Conference Evaluation - Day 2 Resident Cases

1300-1315 - Shahistha Sayeda - Unusual ovarian tumour arising in a patient with a complex clinical background

We present an unusual ovarian tumour arising in a patient with a complex clinical background. Histologic examination revealed two distinct but intimately associated morphologic components with contrasting immunophenotypic profiles. This case highlights the value of integrating clinical history, morphology and immunohistochemistry when approaching a diagnostically challenging ovarian neoplasm.

At the end of the session, participants will be able to:

Develop a differential diagnosis for an ovarian mass in a young patient
Integrate clinical, radiologic, gross, and histologic findings to reach a unifying diagnosis
Recognize how karyotype and gonadal development can reframe the diagnostic approach
Understand tumour-predisposition biology and its implications for patient management

Target audience: Pathologists, Residents, Medical Students

CanMEDS Roles: Medical Expert, Collaborator, Scholar, Health Advocate

This event is an Accredited Group Learning Activity (Section 1) as defined by the Maintenance of Certification Program of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada and approved by the Canadian Association of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation.

Rate the quality of the activity on a scale of 1 star (strongly disagree) to 5 stars (strongly agree).

Space Cell	Enhanced my knowledge	Satisfied my expectations	Conveyed information that applied to my practice	Was free from commercial bias?
This Activity:	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Enhanced my knowledge 2 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Enhanced my knowledge 3 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Enhanced my knowledge 4 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Enhanced my knowledge 5 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Enhanced my knowledge	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Satisfied my expectations 2 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Satisfied my expectations 3 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Satisfied my expectations 4 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Satisfied my expectations 5 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Satisfied my expectations	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Conveyed information that applied to my practice 2 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Conveyed information that applied to my practice 3 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Conveyed information that applied to my practice 4 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Conveyed information that applied to my practice 5 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Conveyed information that applied to my practice	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Was free from commercial bias? 2 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Was free from commercial bias? 3 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Was free from commercial bias? 4 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Was free from commercial bias? 5 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Was free from commercial bias?

Comments

Rate the quality of the activity on a scale of 1 star (strongly disagree) to 5 stars (strongly agree).

Space Cell	Overall Presentation Effectiveness	Content Relevance	Used Effective Teaching Methods	Allocated at least 25% of the time for interaction
This Activity:	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Overall Presentation Effectiveness 2 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Overall Presentation Effectiveness 3 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Overall Presentation Effectiveness 4 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Overall Presentation Effectiveness 5 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Overall Presentation Effectiveness	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Content Relevance 2 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Content Relevance 3 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Content Relevance 4 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Content Relevance 5 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Content Relevance	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Used Effective Teaching Methods 2 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Used Effective Teaching Methods 3 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Used Effective Teaching Methods 4 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Used Effective Teaching Methods 5 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Used Effective Teaching Methods	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Allocated at least 25% of the time for interaction 2 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Allocated at least 25% of the time for interaction 3 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Allocated at least 25% of the time for interaction 4 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Allocated at least 25% of the time for interaction 5 out of 5 stars for This Activity:: Allocated at least 25% of the time for interaction

Comments

Rate how the activity met the stated overall learning objectives.Scale of 1 star (strongly disagree) to 5 stars (strongly agree).

Space Cell	Rating
Develop a differential diagnosis for an ovarian mass in a young patient	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for Develop a differential diagnosis for an ovarian mass in a young patient: Rating 2 out of 5 stars for Develop a differential diagnosis for an ovarian mass in a young patient: Rating 3 out of 5 stars for Develop a differential diagnosis for an ovarian mass in a young patient: Rating 4 out of 5 stars for Develop a differential diagnosis for an ovarian mass in a young patient: Rating 5 out of 5 stars for Develop a differential diagnosis for an ovarian mass in a young patient: Rating
Integrate clinical, radiologic, gross, and histologic findings to reach a unifying diagnosis	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for Integrate clinical, radiologic, gross, and histologic findings to reach a unifying diagnosis: Rating 2 out of 5 stars for Integrate clinical, radiologic, gross, and histologic findings to reach a unifying diagnosis: Rating 3 out of 5 stars for Integrate clinical, radiologic, gross, and histologic findings to reach a unifying diagnosis: Rating 4 out of 5 stars for Integrate clinical, radiologic, gross, and histologic findings to reach a unifying diagnosis: Rating 5 out of 5 stars for Integrate clinical, radiologic, gross, and histologic findings to reach a unifying diagnosis: Rating
Recognize how karyotype and gonadal development can reframe the diagnostic approach	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for Recognize how karyotype and gonadal development can reframe the diagnostic approach: Rating 2 out of 5 stars for Recognize how karyotype and gonadal development can reframe the diagnostic approach: Rating 3 out of 5 stars for Recognize how karyotype and gonadal development can reframe the diagnostic approach: Rating 4 out of 5 stars for Recognize how karyotype and gonadal development can reframe the diagnostic approach: Rating 5 out of 5 stars for Recognize how karyotype and gonadal development can reframe the diagnostic approach: Rating
Understand tumour-predisposition biology and its implications for patient management	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for Understand tumour-predisposition biology and its implications for patient management : Rating 2 out of 5 stars for Understand tumour-predisposition biology and its implications for patient management : Rating 3 out of 5 stars for Understand tumour-predisposition biology and its implications for patient management : Rating 4 out of 5 stars for Understand tumour-predisposition biology and its implications for patient management : Rating 5 out of 5 stars for Understand tumour-predisposition biology and its implications for patient management : Rating

Please indicate which CanMEDS roles you felt were addressed during this educational activity.

Speaker Feedback

Space Cell	Shahistha Sayeda
Established clear educational objectives	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for Established clear educational objectives: Shahistha Sayeda 2 out of 5 stars for Established clear educational objectives: Shahistha Sayeda 3 out of 5 stars for Established clear educational objectives: Shahistha Sayeda 4 out of 5 stars for Established clear educational objectives: Shahistha Sayeda 5 out of 5 stars for Established clear educational objectives: Shahistha Sayeda
Answered questions effectively	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for Answered questions effectively: Shahistha Sayeda 2 out of 5 stars for Answered questions effectively: Shahistha Sayeda 3 out of 5 stars for Answered questions effectively: Shahistha Sayeda 4 out of 5 stars for Answered questions effectively: Shahistha Sayeda 5 out of 5 stars for Answered questions effectively: Shahistha Sayeda
Teaching style was effective in terms of meeting your educational needs	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for Teaching style was effective in terms of meeting your educational needs: Shahistha Sayeda 2 out of 5 stars for Teaching style was effective in terms of meeting your educational needs: Shahistha Sayeda 3 out of 5 stars for Teaching style was effective in terms of meeting your educational needs: Shahistha Sayeda 4 out of 5 stars for Teaching style was effective in terms of meeting your educational needs: Shahistha Sayeda 5 out of 5 stars for Teaching style was effective in terms of meeting your educational needs: Shahistha Sayeda
Encouraged interaction and engaged the participants	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for Encouraged interaction and engaged the participants: Shahistha Sayeda 2 out of 5 stars for Encouraged interaction and engaged the participants: Shahistha Sayeda 3 out of 5 stars for Encouraged interaction and engaged the participants: Shahistha Sayeda 4 out of 5 stars for Encouraged interaction and engaged the participants: Shahistha Sayeda 5 out of 5 stars for Encouraged interaction and engaged the participants: Shahistha Sayeda
Credible, non-biased and knowledgeable	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for Credible, non-biased and knowledgeable: Shahistha Sayeda 2 out of 5 stars for Credible, non-biased and knowledgeable: Shahistha Sayeda 3 out of 5 stars for Credible, non-biased and knowledgeable: Shahistha Sayeda 4 out of 5 stars for Credible, non-biased and knowledgeable: Shahistha Sayeda 5 out of 5 stars for Credible, non-biased and knowledgeable: Shahistha Sayeda

Comments

What could the educator have done differently?